<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Streamline land use code revision process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://salidacitizen.com/2009/11/streamline-code-revisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://salidacitizen.com/2009/11/streamline-code-revisions/</link>
	<description>Community news, blogs, info, videos and events for Salida, Colorado.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Rasmussen</title>
		<link>http://salidacitizen.com/2009/11/streamline-code-revisions/comment-page-1/#comment-2959</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Rasmussen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://salidacitizen.com/?p=5585#comment-2959</guid>
		<description>The final steps of redoing our archaic land use code should produce a new code which will benefit all stakeholders in the county. Don Reimer and Kim are quite capable of producing new and functional code from the Round Table recommendations. Most disputes will be legitimate and readily solved. Interested parties, however, may want to pay close attention to the details of the committee&#039;s actions and their oversight function. It is quite possible that some disaffected members will use try to that forum to delay the implementation of a new code because it would defeat their narrow economic perspectives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final steps of redoing our archaic land use code should produce a new code which will benefit all stakeholders in the county. Don Reimer and Kim are quite capable of producing new and functional code from the Round Table recommendations. Most disputes will be legitimate and readily solved. Interested parties, however, may want to pay close attention to the details of the committee&#8217;s actions and their oversight function. It is quite possible that some disaffected members will use try to that forum to delay the implementation of a new code because it would defeat their narrow economic perspectives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Antonucci</title>
		<link>http://salidacitizen.com/2009/11/streamline-code-revisions/comment-page-1/#comment-1861</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Antonucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://salidacitizen.com/?p=5585#comment-1861</guid>
		<description>Your comments are well taken, Lee, and the only way an idea like this can be implemented (or even heard) is for you to attend the meeting to voice your opinion. The meeting included only roundtable representatives and no one else, not even the press. In the end, the BoCC created a 14-member committee charged with evaluating technical codes. While alternates were designated, they were also encouraged to attend and participate in every meeting. I will post the focus group representatives and more information on the Chaffee County website. Timelines have not yet been established.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comments are well taken, Lee, and the only way an idea like this can be implemented (or even heard) is for you to attend the meeting to voice your opinion. The meeting included only roundtable representatives and no one else, not even the press. In the end, the BoCC created a 14-member committee charged with evaluating technical codes. While alternates were designated, they were also encouraged to attend and participate in every meeting. I will post the focus group representatives and more information on the Chaffee County website. Timelines have not yet been established.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

