In the months since BLM issued its Record of Decision (ROD), Christo and the Over The River team have been focused on the next phases of the project. This includes development of the Event Management Plans (EMP’s) for the initial phases of the project (staging, anchor and Anchor Transition Frame installation), applying for the county permits and finalizing the installation schedule. As we have been working on these tasks, a couple of things have become increasingly apparent.
First, the public continues to express a strong desire to see the specifics of the EMP’s that are being developed. These plans will include operational details that address the many traffic, safety and other issues that have been raised. Typically, this level of detail is not included in an EIS but is usually in an EMP that is developed after a ROD has been issued. That is the process we are following, but the EMP’s for the initial installation phases won’t be fully developed for some months. This leaves little time between completion of each phase of the EMP and the onset of each phase of installation. Christo believes that the public may not have sufficient time to understand this detailed information before installation begins.
Second, the thoroughness of the BLM’s environmental review process resulted in the ROD being issued several months later than originally planned. As a result, the BLM’s Final EIS authorized 28 months for installation, but only 24 months remained. This timeframe also included many months where work was prohibited in certain areas or otherwise restricted because of mitigation measures designed to avoid sensitive wildlife and recreation seasons. The planning activities since the issuance of the ROD made it increasingly apparent that the remaining installation schedule of 24 months did not allow room for unpredictable events such as severe weather.
For these reasons, Christo has decided to shift the Over The River exhibition date from early August 2014 to early August 2015. This adjustment will allow the EMP’s for the initial project phases to be developed before installation begins so that the public will have time to better understand how traffic, safety and other issues will be addressed. It will also reinstate the full 28 month installation schedule, as included in the Final EIS.
All other aspects of Over The River remain unchanged. The number of installation days remains the same and the comprehensive set of more than 100 mitigation measures will remain in place. The Fremont County, Chaffee County, Colorado Department of Transportation and Colorado State Patrol permitting processes will continue as planned.
Christo understands that this news may be disappointing to thousands of local residents and many thousands of art enthusiasts around the world who are looking forward to experiencing Over The River. Nonetheless, this change will result in a better informed public and an improved installation schedule.
An overview of the permitting, installation, exhibition and removal schedule is available on the Over The River website.
Over The River is a two-week temporary work of art by the artists Christo and Jeanne-Claude. For more information, visit our website at OverTheRiverInfo.com.










Yep, the long and the short of this seems to be the Fremont County Commissioners wanted to see actual plans on how they were going to accomplish this, information which was amazingly left out of the incredibly well thought out and completely comprehensive EIS process..
Hopefully the counties will do what the BLM didn’t and not cave to political pressure, find out exactly what the impacts are, deem them unacceptable, and reject OTR in it’s entirety.
Far from a done deal yet thankfully.
I know you’re being tongue in cheek here, Marshall, but just to let others know, the EIS was, in fact, neither well thought out nor comprehensive. ROAR researchers found so many errors, misinformation, incomplete documentation and poorly constructed psuedo-science that the document is almost worthless. That OTR continues brag about the 100 mitigation requirements is incredible. This shows how harmful the project will be, not how caring they are. If the project is denied, no mitigation is needed!
Probably the best article I’ve read about this whole fiasco to date
http://tinyurl.com/6n6pvy6
FWIW