Letters
Letters from our readers.
A no brainer for the Commissioners(0)
EJ Sherry asks whether we need such a group of schemers in our Garden of Eden.
“Buy and dry” should nix current 1041 application(1)
Alan Rule writes to suggest that the County should look at other activities by Nestlé outside of the current scope of the 1041 permit application.
Come Hell or high water(2)
Judy Shuford compares Nestlé Waters to the biblical Goliath and encourages citizens to participate in local hearings.
Don’t piss on my head and tell me it’s raining(3)
Jimmy Descant writes to say that what the people want is less Reagan-esque strict adherence to the rule book and more Andy Griffith compassion and common sense.
Commissioners to hire additional consultants(0)
John Graham writes to report on the recent County Commissioners meeting, where it was decided to hire additional consultants to look at economic impacts and wetlands issues.
Nestlé open letter to Chaffee County(3)
Nestle provides detailed update of Chaffee water harvesting proposal.
Say yes to a local economy(2)
Suzanne Ward writes to say that a vote against the Nestlé project by county commissioners would support movement into the new era of local, living economies.
Burden of proof upon Nestlé Waters(2)
Richard Cabe notes that the County Commissioners are not obligated to approve the Nestlé project, as a recent Mountain Mail editorial claims.
Chaffee County citizens must also consider questions of local control(2)
Tom Chandler says that local control often disappears when Nestlé arrives.
Mountain Mail misses key Nestlé facts(1)
Daniel F. Zettler addresses a recent article in the Mountain Mail.
County Commission asking wrong questions(2)
According to Askjel Madalhar & Birte Nellessen, the question really should be: are we a socially-responsible community?
Nestlé Waters consultant reports(2)
John Graham forwards four five consultant reports from the Nestlé 1041 application.
Loading ...
Recent Comments