Letters
Letters from our readers.
Burden of proof upon Nestlé Waters(2)
Richard Cabe notes that the County Commissioners are not obligated to approve the Nestlé project, as a recent Mountain Mail editorial claims.
Chaffee County citizens must also consider questions of local control(2)
Tom Chandler says that local control often disappears when Nestlé arrives.
Mountain Mail misses key Nestlé facts(1)
Daniel F. Zettler addresses a recent article in the Mountain Mail.
County Commission asking wrong questions(2)
According to Askjel Madalhar & Birte Nellessen, the question really should be: are we a socially-responsible community?
Nestlé Waters consultant reports(2)
John Graham forwards four five consultant reports from the Nestlé 1041 application.
Nestlé Waters: For the record(7)
Contrary to some recently expressed opinions that information regarding our Chaffee County spring water development project has been difficult to obtain or hidden, Nestlé Waters has worked diligently to ensure that information on the project is readily available to the public and that the approval process is transparent.
New, undisclosed information regarding the Nestlé 1041 application(2)
John Graham forwards a report by Delia Malone of CNHA that raises questions about Nestlé Waters’ 1041 application, recently recommended for approval by the Chaffee County Planning Commission.
Heads-up, Chaffee County(1)
Ann Graham writes to encourage the community to think locally when it comes to the Nestlé project.
Is Nestlé really a good neighbor?(2)
Dr. Sherry proposes that Nestlé pay a small royalty to Chaffee County on the water that it extracts.
Do no harm, stick to the facts and take a long-term view(0)
The state legislature must focus on the real effects cuts will have on families and businesses, on long-term economic competitiveness and on our future prosperity and opportunity, The Bell Policy Center argues.
Hot water on tap for pool(1)
Positive change is afoot (or afin) at the Aquatic Center, as projects involving the installation of the hot water pipe and the reopening of the locker rooms move forward.
Let’s move forward(7)
Hugh Young writes to clarify some issues around the Occupational Lodging Tax (OLT).
Recent Comments